• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   AYBU DSpace
  • FAKÜLTELER
  • DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ
  • Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı
  • Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı Makale Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   AYBU DSpace
  • FAKÜLTELER
  • DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ
  • Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı
  • Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı Makale Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The effect of different surface treatments on roughness and bond strength in low fusing ceramics.

Thumbnail
View/Open
Makale dosyası (12.61Kb)
Date
2011-09
Author
Kara, Haluk Barıs
Ozturk, Atiye Nilgun
Aykent, Filiz
Koc, Ozlem
Ozturk, Bora
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments (air abrasion, acid etching, and laser irradiation) on the surface roughness and bond strength of a low fusing ceramic. Thirty-six discs of low fusing ceramic (Finesse, Ceramco) were prepared (10 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Specimens were divided into three groups (n = 12), and the following treatments were performed: Air abrasion with alumina particles (50 μm), acid etching with 5% HF and Nd:YAG laser irradiation (distance: 1 mm, 100 mJ, 20 Hz, 2 W, and 141.54 J/cm2). Following determination of surface roughness (Ra) by profilometry, specimens were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The luting cement (Clearfil Esthetic Cement) was bonded to the ceramic specimens using Teflon tubes. After 24 h of water storage, shear bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests (α = .05). Two-way ANOVA indicated that surface roughness was significantly affected by surface treatments (p < .001). Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) indicated that the air abrasion group had a significantly higher mean value (p < .05) than the other groups. Shear bond strength was significantly affected by surface treatments (p < .001). Tukey HSD indicated that the air abrasion group had a significantly higher mean value (p < .05) than the other groups. No significant difference was found between the acid-etching and laser-irradiation groups (p > .05). The SEM image of the laser irradiation surface appeared to be relatively smooth as compared to the images of other the groups. Air abrasion of low-fusing porcelain surfaces was effective in improving the bond strength as compared to the acid-etching and laser-irradiation methods.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/646
Collections
  • Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı Makale Koleksiyonu [41]

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV

Açık Erişim Politikası || Rehber || Kütüphane

Ayvalı Mah. Gazze Cad. No: 7 ETLİK / ANKARA

Creative Commons License
DSpace@AYBÜ by Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License.

DSpace@AYBÜ

 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Submit DateTypeDepartmentPublisherThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Submit DateTypeDepartmentPublisher

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV

Açık Erişim Politikası || Rehber || Kütüphane

Ayvalı Mah. Gazze Cad. No: 7 ETLİK / ANKARA

Creative Commons License
DSpace@AYBÜ by Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License.

DSpace@AYBÜ